The Constraints of International Organizations' Autonomy on Countries' Compliance with International Commitments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/marcopolo.v3i6.69Keywords:
International Organizations, Autonomy, Power, International CommitmentsAbstract
Robert O. Keohane, in After Hegemony, argues that reputation explains why countries comply with international commitments. He later sought empirical support for this view, but the results were less conclusive than expected. While international commitments represent a country's pledge to follow global norms, Keohane links their fulfillment to the preservation of national reputation, suggesting that fear of reputational damage incentivizes compliance. However, like individuals obeying domestic laws not just for protection but to avoid punishment, states often comply due to coercive enforcement. This enforcement typically comes from international organizations, whose ability to constrain states depends on their autonomy and power. Therefore, the primary factor driving compliance is the authority of these organizations, while reputation serves as a secondary motivation.
References
Arend, A. C. (1999).Legal rules and international society. Oxford University Press.
Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2012). Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. In Rules for the World. Cornell University Press.
Cheng Tingting, & Liu Yungang. (2019). Information power and its prospect in geographical research. Human Geography, 34(1), 28-36.
Cox, R. W., Jacobson, H. K., Curzon, G., Curzon-Price, V., Nye, J. S., Scheinman, L., ... & Strange, S. (1973).The anatomy of influence: Decision making in international organization(Vol. 3). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Farman, J. C., Gardiner, B. G., & Shanklin, J. D. (1985). Large losses of total ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal ClO x/NO x interaction.Nature,315(6016), 207-210.
French, J. R., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power.Studies in social power,150, 167.
Gruber, L. (2000). Ruling the world: Power politics and the rise of supranational institutions. Princeton University Press.
Gehring, T. (1994).Dynamic International Regimes: lnstitutions for International Environmental Governance (Doctoral dissertation, Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg).
Hongladarom, S. (2007). Information divide, information flow and global justice.The International Review of Information Ethics,7, 77-81.
Kaufman, F. (1977). The 1976 Reports of the National Academy of Sciences on the Chlorofluorocarbon-Ozone Problem.SAE Transactions, 58-77.
Keohane, R. O. (2005). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton university press.
Lazenby, J. F. (2004).The Peloponnesian War. Routledge.
Liu Hongsong. (2006). Autonomous behavior of international organizations: Two theoretical perspectives and their comparison. Diplomatic Review: Journal of China Foreign Affairs University, (3), 104-111.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (1995). A realist reply.International security, 20(1), 82-93.
Molina, M. J., & Rowland, F. S. (1974). Stratospheric sink for chlorofluoromethanes: chlorine atom-catalysed destruction of ozone.Nature,249(5460), 810-812.
Morgenthau, H. J., Thompson, K. W., & Clinton, W. D. (1985). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace(Vol. 688). New York: Knopf.
Nye Jr, J. S., & Owens, W. A. (1996). America's information edge.Foreign Aff.,75, 20.
Pettigrew, A. M. (1972). Information control as a power resource.Sociology,6(2), 187-204.
Reinalda, B., & Verbeek, B. (2011). Policy autonomy of intergovernmental organizations: A challenge to international relations theory?. In International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy (pp. 87-103). Routledge.
Skocpol, T. (2014). Bringing the state back in. InPolicy Process(pp. 126-138). Routledge.
Stolarski, R. S., Krueger, A. J., Schoeberl, M. R., McPeters, R. D., Newman, P. A., & Alpert, J. C. (1986). Nimbus 7 satellite measurements of the springtime Antarctic ozone decrease.Nature,322(6082), 808-811.
Solomon, S., Garcia, R. R., Rowland, F. S., & Wuebbles, D. J. (1986). On the depletion of Antarctic ozone.Nature,321(6072), 755-758.
United Nations Environment Programme, Ozone Secretariat. (2024, October). Draft decision XIII/8 – Matters relating to the Montreal Protocol (COP 13 8 / MOP 36 9 C). United Nations EnvironmentProgramme.https://ozone.unep.org/system/files/documents/COP-13-8_MOP-36-9C.pdf
